tier 0 · diagnostic07 / 08

Find out what is actually broken in your hardware go-to-market.

A structured 12-dimension assessment of your hardware commercialization engine. You answer twelve questions. We score the motion, write a diagnosis, and return a prioritized fix list. The output tells you which engagement tier is the right next move — or that the next move is no outside help at all.

Price
$4,500
Turnaround
10-14 days
Your time
~45 minutes
Take the diagnostic
01 / 04 Deliverable

What lands in your inbox in 10-14 days.

01

A scored assessment.

Your motion graded across twelve dimensions on a 0-to-5 scale. Color-coded by severity. The dimensions where you are strong, the dimensions where you are bleeding pipeline, the dimensions you have not addressed at all.

02

A written diagnosis.

Three to five pages identifying the top three structural gaps in your motion. Pattern-matched against twenty years of hardware go-to-market data. Specific, not generic.

03

A prioritized fix list.

Ranked by leverage, not effort. The fix that would unlock the most pipeline for the least change comes first. The fix that requires a six-month rebuild is named but not prescribed for week one.

04

A tier recommendation.

Whether the next move is a Tier 1 Sprint, a Tier 2 Engine Build, an in-house hire, or no outside help at all. With reasoning, not a sales pitch. Some founders take the diagnostic and never engage further. That is a fine outcome.

Tier 0 · self-qualifying entry point

Take the Hardware Go-to-Market Diagnostic.

Twelve scored questions plus three free-text. Written diagnosis with a prioritized fix list lands in your inbox in 10-14 days.

$4,500  ·  10-14 days  ·  ~45 minutes of your time
Take the diagnostic
02 / 04 The 12 dimensions

Where every hardware motion can break.

The diagnostic scores twelve structural dimensions of your go-to-market motion. Most stalled hardware companies are weak in three to five of these. The fastest path back to compounding pipeline is closing the worst three. The diagnostic finds those three.

01

The 5-Year-Old Test.

Can you describe the product so a 5 year old understands it, under 50 words, zero jargon? The fastest read on whether your customer language has been built yet.

02

Founder posture.

When buyer feedback last surprised you, did you change the build, the narrative, or the motion? Or defend the product? A hard gate on the diagnostic.

03

Category fit.

Does a regulator gate your first commercial sale? FDA and defense-certification paths the four-stage method does not fit cleanly. A hard gate on the diagnostic.

04

Capital sequence.

Did named buyer demand come before the build, or did you raise against assumed demand and go looking for buyers later? The single most expensive sequencing error in hardware.

05

Landed margin reality.

Do you know your true landed gross margin after freight, duty, warranty, RMA, install, and channel, refreshed this quarter? Or is the spreadsheet still carrying bill-of-materials cost?

06

Narrative durability.

Does your story survive the journey from technical champion to chief financial officer to procurement? Or does it die at the handoff?

07

Buyer coalition.

Can you name the full buying coalition for your last deal, with each role's decision criteria? Or do you sell to one persona? The hardware buyer is a committee, not a person.

08

Pipeline-review truth-flow.

In your last pipeline review, who was the loudest voice, who got talked over, and who did not speak at all? Whether your organization can hear its own pipeline reality.

09

Deal design.

Are you structuring pilots so they can convert to production budgets? Or are you closing pilots that die at the innovation-to-business-unit handoff?

10

Comp design fit.

Is your account-executive comp built for a 9-to-18-month hardware cycle and your actual landed margin? Or imported from SaaS and burning hires before the first close?

11

Engine vs. founder dependence.

Could a new VP of Sales run the motion from documented systems alone, without you in the room? Or does the engine live entirely in the founder's head?

12

Board or advisor composition.

Does whoever holds decision-influence over the company carry direct hardware operating experience? Or does every review default to SaaS heuristics that do not transfer?

12 dimensions · 12 questions · written diagnosis

See where your motion is bleeding pipeline.

The diagnostic scores all twelve dimensions, surfaces the worst three, and returns a prioritized fix list. Drop your email and we'll route you to the intake form with email pre-filled.

Take the diagnostic · $4,500
03 / 05 The instrument

The twelve questions, with the scoring anchors.

Each question is scored 0 to 5. The anchors show what a 0 looks like (motion is broken) and what a 5 looks like (motion is operating). Every score in between is interpolated against the same scale. Two questions are hard gates. Q02 (founder posture) and Q03 (category fit) can route an engagement to a referral regardless of the total score. The diagnostic does not just rank you. It pattern-matches your scores against twenty years of hardware engagement data, surfaces the structural gaps the profile predicts, and tells you which tier is the next move.

See the full twelve-question instrument.

Drop your email and the questions appear instantly. You will also join the Forge Friday list. Forge Friday is the hardware go-to-market newsletter, launching soon. Unsubscribe anytime.

Your email goes to the SignalForge mailing list. Nothing else. Spam-free or it isn't worth running.
Q015-Year-Old Test

Describe your product so a 5 year old can understand it. Under 50 words.

Score 0
The answer is full of jargon, brand names, internal taxonomy, or feature lists. The 5 year old cannot restate it. The founder cannot strip the technology from the description.
Score 5
Under 50 words. Zero technical terms. Outcome framing, not feature framing. Restate-able by an untrained listener. A clean compile path from technology mechanism to a human-relevant outcome.
Q02Founder posture · hard gate

Tell me about the last piece of customer or market feedback that surprised you, and what you changed because of it.

Score 0
Defends the original product. Explains why the feedback was wrong. Argues the market does not yet understand the technology. A score of 0 here is a hard gate, not a low number.
Score 5
Names a real change made. A specific shift in build, narrative, or go-to-market motion. Treats feedback as data, not accusation. The listening loop runs across five or more of seven domains.
Q03Category fit · hard gate

Does your commercialization path require FDA approval, defense certification (ITAR or EAR), or another regulator-gated clearance before first commercial sale?

Score 0
Yes. The primary clearance pathway is FDA Class II or III, PMA, IDE, an ITAR-controlled defense article, or another regulator-controlled gate. The standard four-stage method does not fit this cycle, so a 0 routes to a clean referral.
Score 5
No regulator-gated commercial clearance required. The four-stage methodology applies without structural adaptation.
Q04Capital sequence

Before you raised capital to advance your core technology, did you secure at least one signed letter of support, LOI, or paid pilot from a named target buyer at your stated price point?

Score 0
No named buyer interest existed when the seed round closed. Capital is being spent against assumed demand.
Score 5
One or more signed buyer letters of support existed before the seed round. Non-dilutive grant capital was pursued against documented commercial relevance. Equity raises closed against both buyer-pull and technical proof.
Q05Landed margin

What is your true landed gross margin today, and when was it last refreshed?

Score 0
Stated gross margin is bill-of-materials cost only. Landed costs have not been reconciled. The actual landed margin has not been measured in the last 90 days.
Score 5
Landed gross margin is computed, refreshed quarterly, and reported to the board. Hidden costs (freight, duty, warranty reserve, RMA, install, channel) reconciled line by line. The CFO can defend the number under board pressure.
Q06Narrative durability

When your champion repeats your value to their chief financial officer, can the CFO defend the decision to their board in one sentence?

Score 0
You do not know what your champion says when you are not in the room. The deal dies between the technical demo and the procurement table.
Score 5
Champion briefs exist. The language operates at three altitudes (technical, business, board). The narrative survives the journey end to end.
Q07Buyer coalition

Tell me about your typical buyer organization. What headcount band, and for the largest deal you have closed, name every role that touched the decision.

Score 0
Cannot name the buyer-org size band, or sold to "the customer" as a single persona regardless of buyer size.
Score 5
Names the size band and the full coalition for that buyer-org size, with title, function, and decision criteria for each role. The multi-stakeholder map runs live in qualification and in the narrative work.
Q08Truth-flow

In your last pipeline review meeting, who was the loudest voice, who was being dismissed or talked over, and who did not speak at all?

Score 0
All voices "aligned." No dissent surfaced. Cannot name who got dismissed because no one disagreed.
Score 5
Can name the loudest voice, the dismissed critic, and the silent operator from the last review. Leadership runs one-on-ones with the critic and the operator outside the room. A quarterly truth-flow audit is in place.
Q09Deal design

Are your pilots designed to convert to production budgets, or do they require fresh procurement at the production stage?

Score 0
Fresh procurement required. Pilots stall at the innovation-to-business-unit handoff because the deal was never structured for the handoff.
Score 5
Production budget path defined at pilot signature. Budget owner identified. Procurement is anticipated, not reacted to.
Q10Comp design

What is your current AE base-to-variable ratio, your total on-target earnings, and the tenure of the last three sales hires before they left or hit their first closed-won deal?

Score 0
A 50/50 or lower base ratio. On-target earnings below category-typical. A SaaS-imported plan. The last three hires either left under 12 months or never closed a deal.
Score 5
A 70/30 or 60/40 base-to-variable ratio, indexed to actual deal-cycle length and landed unit economics. Milestone-based variable across the deal cycle. Margin-aware commission rates. An ex-SaaS transition rule in place. The last three hires retained past 18 months.
Q11Engine vs. founder

Could a new Vice President of Sales walk in tomorrow and run your motion using documented systems alone, without the founder in the room?

Score 0
Tribal knowledge only. Everything lives in the founder's head. A new hire would spend six months reverse-engineering the motion.
Score 5
Documented runbook, qualification logic, narrative architecture, deal-design templates, and comp plan. The founder-to-system transition is complete or under way. A new VP owns it on day 30.
Q12Board / advisor scan

Do you have a formal board? If yes, score each seat for direct hardware operating experience. If no, walk me through your advisor composition and who you go to for hardware-cycle decisions.

Score 0
Zero hardware-native board seats, or no formal board and no hardware-native advisors. Hardware-cycle decisions get made in isolation or against imported SaaS-pattern advice.
Score 5
Half or more of the seats are hardware-native, or a documented advisory board with hardware-native composition and a structured cadence stands in until equity prices. Quarterly reviews run on hardware-native metrics without re-education.

Plus three free-text questions. What is your buyer actually trying to solve. What is the deal that has been stuck the longest and why. What does your sales hire roadmap look like for the next 12 months. The free-text answers shape the diagnosis as much as the scored ones.

You have seen the instrument

Now take it for your own motion.

The questions are the diagnostic. The diagnosis is the deliverable — three to five pages of pattern-matched analysis against twenty years of hardware engagement data, with a prioritized fix list ranked by leverage.

$4,500  ·  10-14 days  ·  written diagnosis + tier recommendation
Take the diagnostic
04 / 05 Timeline

From signup to written diagnosis in 10-14 days.

Day 0

You take the assessment.

Twelve scored questions plus three free-text questions about your buyer, your stuck deals, and your hire roadmap. Roughly 45 minutes of your time. Submit and you are done.

Days 1 – 4

I review and pattern-match.

Your responses go through the same diagnostic lens that scored every prior engagement. Strengths, gaps, anomalies, sub-sector adjustments. No template. Each diagnosis is written, not auto-generated.

Days 5 – 9

I write the diagnosis.

Three to five pages. Specific to your motion, your sector, your stage. The top three structural gaps with prioritized fixes. The tier recommendation with reasoning.

Days 10 – 14

It lands in your inbox.

Diagnosis delivered as a PDF and a shareable working document. Optional 30-minute walkthrough call available, no extra charge. Some founders take it. Some read the diagnosis and decide on their own.

05 / 05 Who this is for

Self-qualifying. Read this first.

For

Founders and CEOs at hardware, deep tech, life sciences, biotechnology, energy, robotics, healthcare, agtech, advanced manufacturing, or homeland security companies.

  • Sub-500 person companies between $1M and $20M in annual revenue.
  • Pipeline that is not compounding against headcount growth.
  • Founders deciding whether to hire their first sales lead.
  • Companies preparing for a Series A or B raise that need clean go-to-market data for the deck.
  • Boards evaluating commercial readiness before approving capital.
Not for

Companies the diagnostic does not fit.

  • Idea-stage companies. Pre-product founders. The diagnostic assumes a working product.
  • Software-only businesses with self-serve onboarding. The methodology assumptions do not apply.
  • Companies looking for a sales coaching session. Different work, different provider.
  • Vendors selling into hardware companies. Use the contact email at the bottom of the page.
Take the diagnostic

Drop your email. We'll route you to the intake form.

Enter your email below. You will be sent to the 12-question intake form with your email pre-filled. Diagnosis arrives in 10-14 days from submission.

$4,500  ·  10-14 DAYS  ·  WRITTEN DIAGNOSIS + TIER RECOMMENDATION

Your email goes to the SignalForge mailing list and pre-fills your intake form. Spam-free or it isn't worth running.
Take the diagnostic · $4,500